The changing nature of the Asian telecom
market has had a major impact on the approach to investment in infrastructure.
With shifting revenue patterns across the market segments and falling ARPUs on
many services, operators have became considerably more selective about what
they actually invest in. Telecom operators throughout Asia have been adjusting
investment levels on the back of carefully considered investment strategies.
This has seen companies shifting business focus, looking for new ways to add
value to existing revenue streams; it has also seen a strong desire to leverage
new value from infrastructure that is already in place. This has especially
been the case with mobile networks moving increasingly to support mobile
broadband services and newer generations of mobile technologies.
The governments of Asian nations have
long recognised – some earlier than others – that there needed to be some
encouragement of private sector investment to meet the demand for the
all-important capital needed in the telecom sector. At the same time, it was
also generally well recognised that this strategy could not rely on local
investment alone, and would inevitably mean a substantial level of foreign
investment. Of course, despite this recognition, there has inevitably been some
resistance within some administrations to opening up the telecom sector to
foreign investors and as a consequence the level of ‘encouragement’ across the
region has been variable.
The initial round of substantial
investment in telecom infrastructure in Asia was in fixed telephone networks.
Over a number of decades the regional economies were progressively building
their often quite substantial fixed-line national networks. These fixed
networks were in time followed by the building of mobile networks. In many of
the developing nations of the region, the building of fixed-line infrastructure
was not far advanced before it was overwhelmed by the introduction of mobile
infrastructure. This created the phenomenon of ‘substitution’ in many of the
markets of Asia (where mobile services perform the function of the limited, or
even non-existent, fixed telephone services.) Nevertheless, despite the
unevenness in disposition, fixed infrastructure has been and continues to be an
important component in the overall development of the region’s telecom sector.
Coming into 2014 there were an estimated 500 million fixed-line subscribers in
Asia; this was down from a peak of around 570 million in 2009; of course,
fixed-line numbers are considerably less than the more than 3 billion mobile
subscribers to be found in the region. Whilst the fixed line numbers have gone
into an overall decline, in some markets the numbers have continued to
increase. Overall, it is anticipated that the decline will continue for a few
more years before the market ‘levels off.’
As already suggested, the focus of
infrastructure building has been shifting. There has been a major push to
upgrade domestic telecoms networks to Next Generation Networks (NGNs). This
process has seen large scale investment by Asia’s leading telecoms markets in
new-generation IP-based telecommunications networks. At the same time there has
been a major surge in infrastructure building as mostly developed economies
roll out National Broadband Networks (NBNs). These networks come in various
‘shapes and sizes’ as governments work with operators to tackle the strategic
challenge of delivering high speed to the nation. Not surprisingly the NBNs
rely heavily upon fibre; in some cases it is Fibre to the Premises (FttP),
while in others it might be Fibre to the Node (FttN). And the cost varies
accordingly. Those countries that have government backing for NBN roll-out are
generally the ones that have been setting the pace.
In addition to the national networks,
international connectivity remains central to the overall effectiveness of the
region’s telecommunications services. Submarine cable routes criss-cross the
Asia Pacific area, providing both intra-regional and inter-regional networks.
This sector of the market has been characterised by widely fluctuating supply
and demand, which in turn has seen somewhat erratic investment strategies.
Submarine projects are subject to this boom and bust market phenomena, with
planned projects commonly being delayed or abandoned, consortia being reshaped,
etc. In fact, over-supply of capacity has been common in the Asian market. More
recently investments have been less speculative and more focused on predicted
growth. In the meantime, new submarine cable projects continue being proposed
and the cables installed throughout the region. As Asia’s broadband usage
surged, a major effort went into managing the shortfall in capacity between
Asia and the US. At the same time there has been a shift away from the heavy
reliance on the US as a hub for data traffic and this has inevitably resulted
in a further change in focus.
As the demand for wholesale services
continues to rise in Asia, still driven in the short term by voice, but rapidly
being overtaken by data, there has been a boom in IP-based services, with the volume
of international Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) traffic into and out of
Asia having increased at a rapid rate at the expense of the traditional
International Direct Dial (IDD) traffic.
For more information see – http://mrr.cm/ZwM
Find other reports on Asian Market at : http://www.marketresearchreports.com/countries/asia
For regular industry
updates subscribe to our newsletter at: http://www.marketresearchreports.com/subscribe-to-newsletter
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.